Prtg vs zabbix reddit It seems to be a nice monitoring tool overall. For windows it's pretty idiot proof. I got around the sensor limit by creating two PRTG instances. I'm not sure why you think Nagios costs $4k, because it's absolutely free. The Zabbix item prototypes are simply awesome when you know how to create them and work with them. Ya but, Grafana is much better for graphing than Cacti, and zabbix/prtg is much better than cacti A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Zabbix is open-source and available for free, while PRTG follows a commercial Network monitoring tools assist in the upkeep and proper maintenance of organizational computer networks. PRTG is like Zabbix, except Zabbix is free. In our corporation, we had Netdata to monitor our infrastructure and services but now some people are saying we need to migrate to the Zabbix because of some benefits such A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. The unit conversions aren't super great and a lot of the features are missing as the connector between Grafana and PRTG has been neglected for a bit. The idea is to have the PRTG or Zabbix probe at the remote site so we can still capture data and hope to find a reason for the issue when the remote syncs back up with the NOC. It appears There are probably no major functional differences between nagios/Zabbix and PRTG. Zabbix is really great but needs some attention regarding updates, database etc. never looked back. To try to get monitoring parity with Zabbix was going to be a huge undertaking, and porting a lot of our scripts. Which is better for a small ISP where we mainly monitor network devices from Cisco and Juniper?, we need an alerting system, graphing, syslog, dashboard and user control. Usually I'm the one setting things up, but less tech savvy colleagues have been able to set things up as well. I would recommend anybody who wants to use Zabbix take a look at all the I use PRTG in the homelab. Install the agent on a box and point it Zabbix + Splunk is very powerful, but Zabbix + Graylog is free. Nagios, Zabbix, PRTG are basically all 3 the same, do the same thing. In order to upgrade to Zabbix 7. Once you get zabbix installed on your linux box (the hardest part but not too bad) and open up the ports, all you need to do from then on is configure agents. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. It's more akin to Solarwinds/PRTG and focuses on device statistics and uptime. It's dead According to the PRTG pricing page costs for monitoring about 50 devices is in the hundreds. Takes only a few minutes, as it's entirely self-contained on the server side. Or check it out in the app stores   stuff is used most often. Prometheus is "similar" to Zabbix, at least that it's a proper metrics-based monitoring system. Zabbix, Prometheus + Grafana, Telegraf + Influx + Grafana and some look very good. When I monitor APs in PRTG it's just ping because I don't enjoy headaches. API integration much better . If the device number went up so would the costs. It may help you identify some weaknesses in your environment. I've tried hunting for any type of documentation on what the difference is between "agent 1" and "agent 2" and still have no idea what the difference is and when to use one vs the other. Members Online • Impenetrableee. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between PRTG and Zabbix, two popular network monitoring tools. Not so good for monitoring Windows. Zabbix is better hands down, better discovery, low level discovery, very little need to ever configure anything Key Differences between Zabbix and PRTG. Reply reply PRTG has a free version up to 100 sensors that includes just about any type of monitoring. Scalability: PRTG offers a more scalable solution compared to Zabbix. Installed PRTG at the start of the year both at home and at work. Zabbix is a network monitoring tool. With its distributed monitoring architecture, PRTG allows for easy expansion and can handle large-scale Having fiddled with Nagios, PRTG years ago, and now installed this and realized it is not good enough. But I prefer the summary layout of prtg. We looked at all the options and deployed Zabbix within a couple of months. Question Im going to do a proyect for my associate degree using a monitorization tool and I looked up options and ended up having Zabbix and Checkmk as the main options. Make sure you check out PRTG as well. Zabbix is Open Source and comes at no cost. We have the same setup in place. I felt the lack of support for a PRTG remote probe to be installed on a linux box a bit of a letdown but the Zabbix remote monitoring (Zabbix Proxy) works really well. Members Online • yasharn. org) others will "swear" by zabbix, prtg or They'll both do the job. Played with Zabbix, went back to Nagios because I use Centreon, which really makes Nagios management trivial anyone that isn't a script wiz and isn't using a nice GUI like Centreon is just asking for the difficulty they have. If reddit's search isn't working for you, use google: . 500 devices in more than 30 different locations. It's very intuitive. PRTG: Used in the past, but it does require a lot work to get it where you need it. g. Open Source vs Commercial: One of the fundamental differences is their licensing models. ADMIN MOD Zabbix vs Checkmk . In summary, PRTG has a considerably higher amount of supported protocols and monitorable features than Zabbix. Also includes netflow which the other commercial products like to charge special for. Zabbix: Same boat as PRTG setup time is an issue, but loved customization options and it's definitely a powerful tool once I got it I switched to Zabbix to get better SNMP data. Just find one that suits your needs. My main gripe with Zabbix is that the default templates all assume that snmp index numbers never change. It's got a learning curve, but it's not too bad. Now trying out PRTG again years later. This is done by constantly visualizing and monitoring the networks for any troublesome components that could fail or be running slowly before they can compromise the network. Most of our network gear is Cisco which seems straight forward with Zabbix, Cameras just need a ping, but our servers which are running XCP-ng we typically monitor at the hypervisor level depending of the use case. a different speed, where what actually happened is zabbix just getting The major difference between Nagios and Zabbix is the configuration backends. The cost may be if you want support. What specifically did you find lacking with Zabbix? I find Zabbix to be way more powerful than PRTG and would prefer it over PRTG any day of the week. . Our team doesn't have the resources atm for that. Definitely Zabbix > Nagios in my opinion Splunk is an awesome tool, but it is insanely expensive if you plan on ingesting a lot of logs. But it's extremely rewarding, as it can monitor just about anything, scales from a raspberry pi to FAANG-scale. There's tons of OSS monitoring solutions it there, LibreNMS, Nagios, Zabbix, Icinga, CheckNK, Prometheus, OpenNMS. Monitoring: Zabbix, Log Shipping: Fluentbit, Log Storage: Loki,Log Analysis: Grafana. Used PRTG about 2yrs, hit the 100sensor limit and gave zabbix a try. I have several PRTG instances installed so far, and one Zabbix. It’s a bit clunky but I had a logical divide (IT infra vs IoT/smart home tech) so it worked. This for a Windows domain environment. The official home of #Supernote lineup on Reddit. Just looking for something simple and easy to see all my devices health quickly. The Zabbix agent isn't strictly necessary either depending on what you're monitoring and what interfaces it outputs data on. With Zabbix, once I wrote a script Been running and maintaining Zabbix for the last 10 years. Built a fair amount of custom sensors for ourselves, they make those easy. PRTG is also popular and free for less than 100 sensors. I thought you were saying the alerting in Zabbix was lacking. There are many other reasons I don't like PRTG, just my $0. Is this possible with Zabbix or does each host (VM) need to be monitored individually? We use PRTG. Zabbix is the ultimate enterprise-level software designed for real-time monitoring of millions of metrics collected from tens of thousands of servers, virtual machines and network devices. The installation Why should someone install Zabbix over CheckMK, Nagios, PRTG, SolarWinds, or any other similar tool? Why should someone install another product instead of Zabbix? I The main things we use PRTG for are network hardware up status and traffic monitoring (through put relative to negotiated link), security camera up status and server monitoring (firewall, PRTG vs Zabbix - See how these products stack up against each other with real user reviews, product feature comparisons and screenshots. However, if you run patches, or add/remove modules, or do a port breakout, they do change - and then all your graphs are meaningless, and you are flooded by alerts for ports having changed to e. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The monitoring tools the PRTG and Zabbix are both monitoring solutions, but PRTG is a commercial solution with a focus on real-time data collection and a comprehensive set of monitoring sensors, while Zabbix is an open-source In summary, PRTG has a considerably higher amount of supported protocols and monitorable features than Zabbix. Zabbix has a little bit of a learning curve. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I prefer NetXMS (netxms. It works great, but I'm coming to the Freebie edition's limits in my home lab (100 sensors). ADMIN MOD Netdata vs. Something like PRTG is much easier to setup. The installation and upgrading process for PRTG is also extremely fast compared to any of the Zabbix installation approaches. Found a great unifi template that has been pretty spot on. Along comes Zabbix! Again, compared to Uptime Kuma, it's a little bit more involved, but there are tutorials online. Also I haven't yet figured out if I can/how to setup port/service monitoring on Librenms so PRTG wins that one too. 0 LTS you need to upgrade your repository package and download and install the new Zabbix component packages (Zabbix server, proxy, frontend, and other Zabbix components). Zabbix for monitoring infrastructures and services . We are running Zabbix some months for testing and the features that do the same like PRTG are more complex but with time you are able to obtain. Rather than just guessing, or asking on reddit, really what you need to do is pilot zabbix. The design and UI are cleaner and feels more modern, and is simply easier to use. Archived post. RMM for windows, Zabbix for Our equipment fortunately is bog standard so I haven't had to deal with mib imports. Support isn't the greatest IMO. I think the biggest advantage of a paid solution is typically the pre-configured triggers that come with them, as so far I think tweaking those in our system is what I've spent Between Zabbix Share and GitHub there is quite a bit of templates you can use to quickly get your monitoring started. No, I don't think you'll regret it. I do something non standard and have Agents and Fluentbit on each of my Docker containers pointing to a proxy service on each host which then are in charge of getting it up to the central services. This may be part of the reason zabbix has such a difficult learning curve. I invested quite some time to get all my devices monitored the way I wanted to. AlienVault OSSIM is more or less a GUI built around their threat intelligence offerings. There's a free evrsion for up to 100 monitors. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer I'm a long time user of PRTG in the work place and in my home lab. So, I learned about Zabbix and decided to give it a shot. We're using Zabbix. Great for monitoring network devices and everything that has SNMP (Printers, switches, routers, Server Hardware). With a custom media type I've managed to set up a webhook, such that if my Mailcow server becomes unresponsive (IMAP / POP / SMTP goes down) it'll trigger Jenkins to remote in to the mailserver and restart the docker Conclusion. Switched from Zabbix to CheckMK to reduce admin effort. To say the least, I feel overwhelmed. PRTG vs Zabbix: What are the differences? Introduction. 02. We have fine tuned it to our specific needs, and it seems to be working well. The design and UI are cleaner and feels more modern, and is simply easier to use. But PRTG licensing is very limiting, you gotta think about how you want to spend your "sensors". When you start the Zabbix server, an automatic database schema upgrade will be performed. InfluxDB also has a pretty solid looking roadmap. I use CheckMK at my current work place and it reminds of very much of this. It's a piece of cake to setup. I’ve used it in 3 of my last 4 jobs so I feel like it’s a good idea to keep up with the developments in it. CheckMK is as easy as it gets. Nagios uses files whereas Zabbix uses a database. It has some logging capability but definitely isn't a traditional SIEM. We are using now integration with Grafana for customized Dashboard and Dynamic flow maps. Using it, on the other hand, has a steep learning curve. We install this week integration with Datadog. But it isn't always what scales the best. Zabbix. I prefer the traffic graphs in Librenms. Have no complains, only good things to say. Librenms vs Zabbix . but stuck with PRTG. Zabbix is open source and free. Find out which one is best for your organization. prtg feels like a prison compared to zabbix where i can do anything i want. We found getting set up with Zabbix to be relatively easily actually. Edit1: I just realized I misread your statement. As a classic Windows admin, I would I've used zabbix extensively and prtg only in my most recent position. Discover the elegance of the Supernote, an e-notebook designed for distraction-free writing, reading, and annotating. hfoa suswa zwzfu rehz urokg mqhsbxh bwr rgyebv uyencouz ilwhju