Siglent vs rigol reddit. about 130 Euros more than the rigol ds1054z).
Siglent vs rigol reddit Sep 8, 2024 · Even though Rigol924 has declared 250MHz bandwidht, this obviously has to falls with 3 or more channels. ) Looking at the user's manual, the software looks a bit immature (could use some polish) and the UI looks more complicated than the Rigol's. Hi! I'm looking for a good entry-level signal generator for my lab. 6kg), however the Siglent housing and display is much larger. Nov 8, 2019 · This video presents what deep memory is in an oscilloscope and how a comparison; Keysight vs Siglent Deep Memory. 25GS/sec 2 ADC at 1GS/s each Analog Bandwidth (un-hacked) 125Mhz 100Mhz ADC resolution 12 bits 8 bits Waveform capture rate 1,000,000 wfm/s 100,000wfm/s(normal mode) or 400,000 wfm/s(sequence mode) Screen 7" 1024x600 touchscreen 7" 800x480 no As far as I know, both the cheaper Siglent and Rigol 70 MHz oscilloscopes can be hacked to allow for 350 MHz bandwidth. 1 GHz, compared to the 1. I mean I am the idiot who bought the Hantek despite knowing better (or at least I thought I knew better, maybe I am even dumber than I think) so maybe don’t take my opinions seriously. When it comes to oscilloscopes, Siglent and Rigol are two of the most well-known brands. The Rigol DS1054Z has 4 Channels but only has 50 MHz of bandwidth, while the Siglent has 2 Channels but 200 MHz. Jun 29, 2020 · I might have gone with Owon at the time, but the availability (for private customers) and support didn't look good in EU, so I went with Siglent. Thanks for the information here but I have to ask do you own a Rigol dho804? I am reading in the comments on a couple youtube videos that there has been a firmware update and they are unable to unlock the extra bandwith, which was a big draw to the 804 vs the 814. The training material for the Keysight will be followed and then a comparison to the Rigol and Siglent made. Thread starter rsmith9945; Start date Mar 16, 2021; Im also interested in the siglent parts, but Siglent has responded with like 12 bit scopes. 1024x600, but for the small ones, Siglent offers a wider screen and more horizontal pixels. Jun 6, 2020 · Siglent SDS2104X Plus (100MHz). The more expenisve route will always give you a nicer solution. This is important when studying the impact of signal reflections due to mismatches for instance. This is not a given for Siglent or Rigol. (Related: not looking too hard at hobbyists unlocking features). ). And that without hacking it. Anyone interested can go to the test equipment forum on EEVBlog for more details. Help! The instructor is using a Rigol DS2072A Osc. Additionally, 100% of RIGOL Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution. I found stuff like this: https://hackaday. The software is better too, not that you can't spend time on 3rd party apps etc to bring the Rigol up. For even more from Keysight Jan 11, 2021 · Siglent SDS1104X-E 100MHz 4 Channel Digital Oscilloscope. Reply reply I use one of those cheap Chinese power supplies. Also, consider memory depth. Siglent are relatively new (certainly to me) but, unlike companies like Rigol, whose offerings are cheap, low performance models, Siglent seem to be offering real competition to the big boys. 0% mindshare. Oct 15, 2023 · Both web consoles are basically lag free and update immediately (I tried on a 1gig wired network and using wifi), but the refresh rate seems a bit faster on the Rigol. Rigol offered extended 5 year warranty too. if i had to buy a siglent i wouldn't get anything less than sds1000x series anyway, siglent makes better hardware than rigol, as much better as it can be when you are racing to the lowest cost The Rigol DS1054Z is widely acclaimed as best bang-for-buck for intermediate hobbyists, they go for around us$400 last time I checked. Affiliate links t Aug 16, 2020 · Because of this, even the Rigol 1052E as well as the corresponding bottom of the barrel Siglent scopes (CML etc. So, is there some significant advantage on Rigol's Jul 16, 2023 · What price range are you looking at? Rigol Clearance has the DS1102Z-E for $223 right now (vs. I've watched a pretty substantial amount of YouTube videos, have read the wiki and searched both this sub and Reddit as a whole . Jun 29, 2020 · I'm looking for a new mid-range scope, 2Ch, 2GSa/s would be about right with 200-300Mhz bandwidth. don't see where there's much difference. Aug 21, 2018 · The Siglent definitely has the edge at the moment when it comes to specs, and in my own opinion the Siglent price/performance is superior to the Rigol. Or maybe visualize UART or USB or switched-mode power supply circuits. I ordered from Amazon the day before I found out and asked Rigol's customer service if I could get the free upgrades anyway. I have some minor issues with the 1054 holding a signal steady, gotta really tweak the trigger level to get it to lock in, a problem I didn't have with my two channel Siglent. 2Ghz while the Rigols to 7. Siglent SDS1104X-E 100Mhz digital oscilloscope. Then, owning both devices, I find the build quality of the siglent not on par with the rigol, which just feels beefier in material and construction. the Rigol DHO800/900, I would say that the Rigol is more beginner-friendly because of its UI. This makes the Siglent better suited for testing components at higher frequencies. Feature-3: Memory Depth. Siglent. 5 or fewer samples - seems like guesswork. Mir scheint Siglent wird Rigol irgendwann mal überholen Welcome to Reddit's own amateur (ham) radio club. RIGOL Technologies is ranked #2, while Siglent is ranked #1. io/project/5807-driverless-rigol-ds1054z-screen-capture-over-lan which look encouraging. Well, the siglent sds 1104x-e is for sure the more capable oscilloscope, but it is significantly more expensive (e. Rigol is also good, small FFT size but if you don’t care about that it shouldn’t disappoint you. Jun 29, 2020 · Rigol and Siglent are both good quality, reliable brands with fairly comparable features and quite accurate measurement and math capability. I prefer having the separate stand-alone piece of kit which I can just power on when I need it. And all the clever shit like i2c decoding is on by default when you buy new from Rigol. I went with a Siglent SDS1104X-U instead, when I was looking for I use both the keysight at work and the rigol for a home lab and the keysight is just better. Rigol Oscilloscopes Comparison. Rigol DS1054Z or Siglent SDS1202X-E for ADC project I'm starting a project attempting to interface a 24bit precision ADC (LTC2512-24, Fs=819kSPS) with an STM32 MCU. While I only have a 2 channel scope, I have one that has built in UART/I2C/SPI/LIN decode (SDS1202X-E), of which I use the UART decode a fair bit (at 115kbaud), and have looked at I2C as well. 4 channels WILL help you a good deal, but i wouldn't sacrifice sample rate for it. It reveals that the Rigol DS1102E is the most popular of the sort of entry level digital scopes, but OWON SDS7102 is $50 more, has a much larger screen, and a LAN port. Mar 7, 2024 · But by now, I am pretty convinced to stay away from Owon. The reseller stocks all models of Rigol, Siglent and R&S and support is good. Fast memory to capture a spike and being able to "zoom in" on a portion of it is expensive. I want to buy programmable PSU and Uni-T UDP3305S-E model seems good option since it has more power (2x 5A) compared to similar priced Siglent model which has 2x 3. r/embedded Jul 17, 2018 · Anyway then I decided to check the size of the bigger Siglent out, vs the Rigol. 2A. Others have proposed a Rigol model, which I think I'll check out myself. Anyone around that can 'clue me in' on the Siglent over the older Rigol. It's fast enough that you can easily debug microcontroller stuff too, so if you want to try making more technically involved modules, it's right there for you to use. The Keysight is also the most feature rich and will be used for base comparison to the Rigol and Siglent. Hacked, it can replace Keysight 3034T for many people that don't need special protocols, active probes and really fast re-trigger rate . Last Post by Martin Richard 4 years ago. Rigol doesn’t even make a handheld. You don't always need that third or fourth channel, but when you do, you absolutely do. Buying oscilloscope: used Rigol ds1054z Vs new or siglent sds1104x-u (EU) I have an option to The Rigol DS1054z which is cheaper but only 50Mhz (easily unlocked to 100Mhz). Winner (Siglent vs Rigol Oscilloscope) The winner of this competition is the Rigol Company. They aren't horrible. Given my price range, I've looked mainly at the Siglent SPD3303X-E and the Rigol DP832. Now, being an IT tech person, I really ought to have been able to do this on computer, but I got the masking tape and tape measure out. It typically offers all relevant settings in a large dialog box, where Siglent often distributes them over multiple side-panel menus. Either go the cheap route, or step up to more more with more features. For embedded development, you may need more scope channels or logic analyzer channels to decode UART / I2C / SPI bus data. Keysight EDUX1002 reviewhttps://youtu. Jun 4, 2021 · I'm not sure how they get to over 100Mhz with 4 channels running with only 2. In most cases, the sample rate of Rigol and Siglent scopes are the same(1GSa/s). You can get some great deals on equipment buying used, if you’re willing to do that route. Both Rigol and Tektronix offer options with more than 200 MHz bandwidth, including the Rigol DS2302E which has 250 MHz, and the Tektronix MDO3054 which has 350 MHz. Seems to have more/better features. Both Chinese companies, Rigol was founded in 1998 while Siglent was founded four years later. does not. Have you used any of these 6. Rigol vs Siglent also comes down to preference of the user interface. Both are known for their quality and performance, but there are some key differences between the two that you should know about before buying a product. Quote from: Martin72 on October 22, 2020, 07:43:37 pm On the other hand, the siglent salesmanager wrote me once, to keep the sds5000x still attractive, not all of the possible features will be implemented in the Jun 3, 2015 · Siglent's is still TBD - no real reviews and very little feedback so far. I would rather expect it for R&S but I haven't looked at the data sheet. RSS $999 : Rigol MSO5074 (70MHz 4chan 8bit 100/200Mpts) (16chan logic analyzer connector on front) $999 : Rigol DHO1074 (70MHz 4chan 12bit 50/100Mpts) (logic analyzer connector not available) $3280 : Siglent SDS2104X HD (100MHz 4chan 12bit 200Mpts) (16chan logic analyzer connector on front) Special Rigol promotions until September 30, 2023: Sep 22, 2024 · If you want to compare the Siglent SDS800X HD family vs. 32k memory points for instance No serial decode is another 1072CML+ is newer, with more memory, with more bandwidth for a sligtly higher price, but still no decode. If you can wait and if it actually drops in a few months at pricing competitive with the Rigol, the Siglent SDS800X HD (direct competitor to the DHO800 series) may be the even better option. Hello everyone, I'm currently weighing my options between the Rigol DHO804 and the Rigol DHO914S. Siglent is more refined and the SW is less buggy for little extra cost. I have looked at several scopes in my price range, including: Rigol MSO5104 Siglent SDS2104X Plus 4Ch 100MHz Apr 14, 2024 · RIGOL Technologies and Siglent are both solutions in the Oscilloscopes category. This product from Rigol has a real-time sample rate of up to 1 GSa/s and a memory depth of up to 24 Mpts. Where you start bumping into their limitations is when you need a spectrum analyzer, reasonably precise and quick FFT and so on. Siglent also has 2x memory depth - 100Mpoints vs Rigol's 50 Mpoints - both models share them for all channels. That means I can get the full 100Mhz while using two channels, instead of 50Mhz with the Rigol. You'd probably look for having 1GHz bandwidth WHILE using two channels. Jun 5, 2017 · I had my mind set on Rigol DS1054z, but I just recently noticed that Siglent has released SDS1202X-E, the specs of which seem to be superior except for the number of channels. Then Hantek, then FNIRSI. You can make it 100MHz with a little trick you can find on YouTube Or even a higher end Rigol. May 7, 2019 · Besides Rigol and Hantek, you can also look into the Siglent series of scopes. If you buying your first go for the 4 channels. Should I buy now, wait for so. 99. It has a shorter rise time, a bit more memory as well. 2 channels with higher frequency? From my research, it seems folks are generally recommending Siglent, Rigol or Digilent AD2. 95% of the time, I whip out the $7USD USBee 8-channel 24MHz logic analyzer clone from eBay and use the analog from the DSO. I have a nice Siglent DSO. My journey in test electronics so far has involved using an Arduino Mega and a Saleae USB, focusing on learning electronics, repairing home equipment, and a bit of device hacking. With the SDS800X HD, I have some doubts as to whether the Scope is the answer to Rigol's DHO 800. Plus lower bandwidth and you see where the extra $$$ went to for the Siglent. People tend to equate Rigol and siglent, but I think Rigol builds the better scope in my opinion. While Siglent Technologies claims victory on the Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-E debate, it’s your decision which one to buy in the end I used to have rigol, now I switched to siglent. Something with similar features from Rigol if you are okay with a few hundred dollars more PlDS1104Z-S Plus. Feb 9, 2021 · Rigol and Siglent has the possibility to unlock it all Keysight is quite expensive to increase BW or options Rigol and Siglent can be upgarded with 16 digital channels (not possible on the Keysight) User Interface Rigol was not very polished and I found it to be a little "messy" Siglent is much more my way (but I always will prefer separate Just get a rigol or a siglent on amazon. HP $1500 RIGOL $2000 SDR $150 Asset tracking & theft prevention by using these low power transceivers, but they go inside equipment made partly of metal. ) provide filters. Hey all! I am currently in the market for upgrading from my Rigol DS1054Z to something with higher bandwidth I had the rigol DHO924(s) and the siglent sds824x in mind, but I am torn whether 250 MHz is realistic with 1. Keysight also has a pretty new line of budget scopes (1000X series) but they start at $1500 if you want to match the channel count and bandwidth of the Rigol (which can trivially have full bandwidth and all software features unlocked). (It might be great, who knows. Oct 21, 2016 · Re: Rigol DM3058 vs Siglent SDM 3055 Bench multimeters « Reply #6 on: November 17, 2016, 05:08:49 am » If you want to save a few $ there's also the more recently released 4 1/2 digit SDM3045X. The company was founded in 1998 and has since become a leading supplier of oscilloscopes, among other devices. I bought mine for 350 dollars. Is in the same price category as the Siglent and HMO. Very fast and responsive. We have Rigols at work and I know they work fine but the interface doesn't mesh with my brain. Best regards, Darko It mentions the siglent sds1202x-e but the rigol scope has similar, in some cases better specs than the siglent one. My Siglent SDS2104X Plus however does. Nov 2, 2024 · In this case, there are three that continuously pop up whenever you discuss oscilloscopes: Rigol, Hantek, and Siglent. I'm looking at the Rigol DS2302 and the Siglent SD2352. The Rigol DS1054Z is an exceptional digital oscilloscope that combines functionality and affordability, making it one of the best inexpensive oscilloscopes on the market. Conclusion. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. But both are great scopes however Aug 3, 2022 · Re: Rigol VS Hantek VS OWON « Reply #4 on: August 03, 2022, 02:59:27 pm » Check SDS1104X-E, although it will be more expensive unless there is some promotion. in my experience one very rarely needs high accuracy vertical for scope measurements. Please note that some of new siglents have V2 protection and unlocking features and options is not as trivial as it used to be. So there's that. Im looking for a good tabletop power supply and was thinking about grabbing a Rigol dp932 but I have a couple questions I was hoping could be answered here before I pull the trigger. Jul 15, 2019 · Focus will be on the Keysight since it is the newest of the scopes and I need to assess it. The cheaper 2-channel Siglent scope will decode the two-wire protocols like UART or i2c no problem I believe. I am just not sure if I should spend over 400 EUR on a supply. Check out the size difference between retired test engineer here. 4 channels is super handy for SPI and various other things. One could compare them to Sony and Canon cameras as both of these camera Companies make excellent cameras but their customers often criticize the brand they did not purchase. Both have 7 inch screens, but the Rigol is higher resolution (1024x600) vs (800x480) and has a touch screen. Useful Video: Rigol vs Siglent 4 channel scopes review, test Also - Rigol 1054 is an old design, look at Siglent 1202/1204 - they have the latest Zynq FPGA for high speed capture and FFTs etc. They just released the DHO800 series and the SDS1104X-E is around 6 years old. Focusing first on mostly analog stuff but would like to get into some digital stuff later. I got a used logic pro 16 for $400 I think, way better value than even a Rigol. Both devices are heavy and have a similar weight (4. Sep 13, 2024 · 2. As it was explained to me, 15+ years ago, Rigol literally manufactured them for agilent and then produced their own brand. 100 MHz 2 channels 24/12 Mpts memory vs 16/8 on the DS1052E (though the DS1052E has a "long" memory mode whatever that is) more trigger types than the DS1052E protocol trigger/decode support larger display (7 inch vs 5. But, I'm still left uncertain. Oct 3, 2024 · Both models have built-in tracking generators, but the Siglent SSA3021X has a slightly higher range of 2. 1054Z - $350, 4 analog channels, no digital channels, 50 MHz Bandwidth I've been wanting to buy a scope for some time and paying attention to the "best" scopes in the under $1k range. These are all 400$ plus which is beyond my budget. . Check Price On Walmart. Their customers are most happy with the Siglemt, but he suggest i would be better of with the Siglent SDS1202X-E. A $500 Rigol has better specs than USB scopes retailing for $800+, the entry/mid level bench tops enjoy a huge economy of scale advantage. The 1104 has 14M vs the Rigol's 24M. Oct 1, 2024 · Two popular four channel oscilloscopes, the Rigol DS1054Z and the Siglent SDS1104X-E, are often compared because of their features and affordability. I think I'm leaning toward the latter, not only for its bandwidth but also for its math operators and serial decoding. The Siglent can also do Bode plotting, which is a feature usually only found on more expensive equipment. Seems like the top contenders are Rigol and Siglent so that's what I'm considering. If you can get away with a non-realtime unit. 5ghz. I have one, it works great. Dec 29, 2020 · They claim these will probably offer me similar results with the main difference being the overal quantity and support of the Owon being maybe a little bit less than Rigol and Siglent. Comparisons. and its a very reasonable Rigol DS1102E VS OWON SDS7102 Done a little bit research. I know that the Rigol's scope can be hacked easily and so on, but even then the specs are not as good as the Siglent's. Feb 23, 2018 · The major difference that I identified between the SDS1204X-E and DS1054Z are: * 200Mhz vs 50Mhz (100Mhz hacked) * 1GSA/s vs 500MSa/s 2ch (500MSa/s vs 250MSa/s 4ch) * 100,000 vs 30,000 wfms/s * 14M vs 28M point memory depth * 256 vs 64 levels intensity grading * Rigol requires hacking for the higher bandwidth, not sure what that means with Hey, I'm looking at a couple scopes at the moment (Siglent SDS1202X-E and SDS1104X-E), and while I'm still looking around, I'm not exactly certain, whether extra channels are worth giving up that 100Mhz of bandwidth in there. Feature-5: Triggering Oct 3, 2016 · yeah, there are reasons for that. The waveform capture rate of the Siglent is over 10 times faster than the Rigol which means that its ability to capture signal anomalies is significantly better. Rigol oscilloscopes have higher memory depth(24Mpts). I have about 12 various CRT scopes, none of which have function generators. Like the Siglent SSA3000X series vs Rigol DSA800 series -- although it looks like the Siglent only go to 3. However, for a lower frequency application like audio stuff I would say that the performance is about the same, and the price point definitely makes the Rigol the more compelling option. SDS1104X-E 100MHz don't understand the difference :) RIGOL 4-Channel 50MHz Digital Oscilloscope (DS1054Z). Nov 3, 2024 · Siglent Vs Hantek Reviews 1. I am not planning to use the digital scope for Rigol and 100 Mhz bandwidth should be Mar 31, 2024 · Well Siglent has proven us wrong on our concerns, in fact so wrong they've not only stayed with the low end DSO market, but introduced outstanding products to counter Rigol, some may see this as raising the intro DSO bar again We've mostly chosen the Siglent path here at "The Labs", and no regrets, Siglent just keeps producing impressive Mar 5, 2024 · While Rigol is better in terms of hardware solution and inovation as well as design and physical contruction, Siglent is also better than Rigol in terms of software application What is the general consensus about which unit is better built, the DHO800 series or the SDS800X HD series. 6 inch) As for the Hantek, there's a huge Oct 24, 2018 · Blah - I'm saying the siglent 1104x-e hardware is better than the Rigol 1054z hardware - It is, even the default specs are better. Oct 1, 2024 · However this has now been replaced with Rigol vs. Lifes about choices. Is 50 MHz oscilloscope enough? When it comes to oscilloscopes, the first question many users ask is about the bandwidth. I can get cheaper the Siglent by about 130 USD. I am planning to use the osciloscope for the UART and CAN/LIN decoding functionality as I work as an embedded dev in automotive industry. For basic tasks, Rigol’s unit may be the best choice. ething good during holiday sales, or is there an expected refresh coming in the next year or so? Jul 21, 2018 · Siglent habe ich erst etwas später als Rigol wahrgenommen, muss aber sagen, dass Siglent nach meiner Meinung irgendwie immer ein Schritt voraus ist. Hardware math functions. It also costs 80$ less So do people here still think that the rigol 200mhz one isn't worth it? Or does the FAQ need a revision? Mar 2, 2021 · Siglent vs Rigol bench oscilloscopes . Mar 8, 2023 · Among the Rigol DS1054Z and Siglent SDS1202X-E, we’ve arrived at the conclusion that Siglent is a better choice for both begginers and intermediate users, while Rigol would be better suited for advanced users. The market for used scopes is extremely small in Denmark, if not completely non-existent, so that is not an option. Operate with 2 channels get 500MS/s, 4 channels get 250MS/s. Go to arrow, buy a rigol ds1054z and if you create a new account you get a discount. Verdict: Siglent SSA3021X offers a slight advantage in the tracking generator frequency range. It has been commented before that sometimes paying a small premium for Siglent is justified. Honestly, I have a budget Rigol 1052E, and I've used a Rigol 1054Z+, and I'd spend the extra on the Siglent if you can afford it. Jul 3, 2019 · The SPD3303X compares to the DP832A, as mentioned, and the lesser versions of both have lower resolution. Are there any other options I should look into? Is it worth getting 4 channels with lower frequency vs. Features: The Siglent SDS1104X-E has 4 channels and 100 MHz bandwidth. about 130 Euros more than the rigol ds1054z). Probes are much higher quality than Winner: Rigol. They look pretty good. The Siglent is a 2-channel scope but Rigol oscilloscopes are 4-channel scopes. be/U19 Nov 20, 2020 · Currently I'm leaning slightly more to the Siglent SSA3032X-R than Rigol RSA3030N (simply based on the price) but if someone knows some feature which would change recommendation to Rigol RSA3030N, please let me know. AFAICT the Rigol can't store multiple traces in memory and let you look back into history. Both of those companies have upped the game of their entry level offerings to compete with folks like Rigol and Siglent - both of whom are perfectly legit options. Der Spekki hat ein größeres Display, zudem ein besseres Phasenrauschen, das Multimeter ist wesentlich ansprechender als das Rigol etc. The software provided for doing screen captures is to put it mildly woeful. Not the worst thing in the world, but can definitely be annoying when you're already frustrated by an issue in your circuit. In this article, we’ll break down the differences, explain what each offers, and help you decide which oscilloscope is the best choice for your needs A dedicated scope from Rigol is okay too because it will have higher bandwidth and specs, but not as many features for the money such as digital channels or ability to decode serial protocols like I2C or SPI. But keep in mind these aren't on the same level as R&S/keysight VNAs. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Real-time acquisition vs "acquiring" mode on Siglent SDS 1104X-E. The Siglent also does Bode plotting. EEVblog #891 - Siglent SSA3021X vs Rigol DSA815 Spectrum Analyser. 3kg/4. 5,081 Views. The Picoscope always felt like more work for some reason and having the extra screen of the 'scope can be handy if you're cross-checking something on There are trade offs to be made for example: switching vs linear; higher voltage, less current vs lower voltage and higher current (5A is pretty typical); more precision vs more power; programability vs a couple of knobs to adjust your output; form factor A specific budget would also be helpful! EDIT: Some general recommendations -- A Rigol 1054Z is the normal home/non-pro scope that people recommend. $280 regular non-clearance price). Rigol MSO5074. Mar 16, 2021 · First Oscilloscope Advice- Keysight DSOX1204G vs. It's not really a logic analyzer, it's a protocol decoder for a few specific protocols. I had this exact model. It's not necessary at all! Many scopes, such as my Rigol DS1054Z 4 channel digital scope doesn't come with a built in generator, and none of the old CRT based analog or analog/digital ones did, as far as I can remember. Price: $499. Dec 23, 2024 · In this video 'Top 3 Oscilloscopes under $400; Rigol vs Siglent vs Uni-T' I will demonstrate features of the best Oscilloscopes under $400. just bought an sds1104x-e. If you aren't sure exactly but really want to buy, I'd suggest going for the bottom-tier 4 channel Rigol/Siglent if you can't find a used scope, since if you need to upgrade later anyway you'll have a cheap backup scope/be out the least amount of money. RIGOL Technologies holds a 24. The rigol interface is slow (especially waiting for it to boot) clunky and has a fairly low Res screen. Debating which one is the best brand between Rigol vs Siglent vs Hantek leads us to an interesting discussion because each brand is great in its own right. Whereas, the Siglent has a memory depth of only 2Mpts. Jun 19, 2016 · Unboxing: The Rigol has a better quality appearance regarding housing/knobs etc. SIglent's has only 200MHz bandwidth and it has more sample rate to begin with. As far as I can tell the only difference between the DP932E & DP932U is the U has 64 volts & 210 Watts where the E has 60 Volts & 198 Watts. Reply reply ResidentEducation For the desk based stuff, then a Rigol or Siglent would be my choice if I was in the market for a new scope. Having lots of storage memory is important too. honestly, you can't really mess this up. It would be an upgrade from an ATX PSU but if you can afford something nicer like the Rigol you wouldn't regret getting it. Right now, the Rigol has the better entry level offering. Dec 18, 2023 · Odd comparison, very soon to be last gen 8 bit scope (albeit one of the best on the low end) vs new gen 12 bit scope. * Vs. In these the difference seemed to be that the Rigol had slightly higher signal purity at higher frequencies, but could output a lower amount peak-to-peak voltage swing at higher frequencies. as far as 10 bit vs 12 bit vertical res goes i wouldn't be too concerned. Dec 7, 2015 · You could consider the Instek GDS 2104A or Instek GDS-2104E as well. Nah, fuck it, Rigol 1054Z should be your starting point, even if you need to work since more overtime to pay for it. I also have the add-on logic analyzer pod. USB scopes tend to be used where the weight and portability advantages are needed or they need to be permanently integrated into a rack or semi permanently integrated to monitor an experiment. From the specs, the Rigol has a slight edge because it has a bit more memory (1 Mpts vs 100 kpts), although as deep memory goes, even 1 Mpts is not really all that much. A bit pricier than the Rigol, which is par for the course. Both scopes you selected are great. the equivalent rigol looks very similar. 5 Digit Desktop Multimeters, what do you like or hate about it? Welcome to Reddit's own amateur (ham) radio club. I saw the Siglent SPD3303C and SPD3303X-E vs the Rigol DP821. The Ridol shares 1 ADC for all 4 ports, so using any 2 inputs on the Rigol drops the sample rate to 500, whereas the Siglent will run at 1ghz when simultaneously using channel 1 and 3 (or 2 and 4). These instrumentation companies have been growing their presence in North America and Europe quite rapidly and their scopes are on lab benches everywhere. I've had this scope for close to a year and it has been awesome. Nov 2, 2024 · The question is, which one do you need? While Siglent Technologies has a better oscilloscope, some users may not need all that power. The Siglent can also do automated Bode plots with a Siglent function generator (or YouTube hacks to use some other function generators), which can be useful for stability analysis. Jesus! I'm sold on the Siglent SPD-3000X-E (-E being the lower resolution version). I understand the main differences, and the two things that peak my interest are that, from what I've read, the FFT appears to be better on the Siglent, and the Siglent has double the sampling rate in multi-channel use. Siglent SDS1104X-E -- $499 4 channels 100 mhz Siglent SDS1202X-E -- $379 2 channels 200 mhz I really wanna learn more about designing complex electronics and feel that this would be a worthwhile investment. For a scope I highly recommend the Siglent sds1202x-e LINK. 8% mindshare in O, compared to Siglent’s 31. Likewise, using all 4 inputs with the Siglent gives you 500mhz each - 250mhz on the Rigol. rigol dho800 siglent sds 1000x series (letter X is important) Need some more ideas. I'm looking to buy a lab DC Power Supply to work on commercial radio systems. One of my probes broke and they sent a new one within three days. The relative upstart companies like Siglent/Rigol can make a business out of the people Keysight ignores, while largely staying out of the super high end, so they work to make people like you interested in buying a hobby scope. 25 Gsamples/s or that it is fine. g. Not that long ago, Rigol was having a promotion on their site that all software-upgrade features for the DS1000Z series were given out for free if you order directly from their site, which is a huge discount. Just one more Siglent / Rigol question: why do people keep saying the Rigols have nicer screens? I get that for the 10" models, where Rigol offers 1280x800 vs. Compared to my old scope feels almost like analog. The Rigol is a much cheaper scope than both the Keysight and the Siglent (Rigol: €335, Siglent: €410, Keysight: €480). The Rigol's are software calculated so they update ~2 times per second and there's no sinx/x interpolation so they look terrible. So please help me with this Here’s a quick comparison table between the two scopes: Metric Rigol Siglent Sampling Rate 1 ADC at 1. 🏷️ Rigol Oscilloscopes ⭐⭐⭐ Dec 30, 2023 · Then Siglent introduces the 12 bit version with added features and faster processing!! Then Rigol introduces the little 12 bit DHO800, and this is a nice little low cost entry level DSO with 12 bit ADCs and such, which we evaluated for a client to use with their product (they needed a small form factor with VEAS mount). Yes having physical controls is pretty good, but everything about picoscope works really well and feels polished where as rigol. It also has a maximum capture rate of 100,000 in normal mode, and 400,000 in sequence mode. The topic comes up in almost every budget power supply thread, so there will be most of the depth of answers, but I'll summarize why I went with the Siglent and ended up getting a second: Smaller form factor Cheaper Slightly more rated power output The Siglent is by no means a perfect I am watching and reading reviews of multiple multi channel power supplies currently but i cannot yet find the right one to go for. Oscilloscopes produced by Rigol simply tend to be better at more categories than oscilloscopes made by Siglent. Dec 6, 2016 · The video compares two different Rigol and Siglent function generators. The Siglent has it as well, for what it's worth, but you need 4 channels to decode protocols like SPI and the 4-channel Siglent scope is $500. Now if you were building a home lab from scratch and had a tight budget the rigol is one of your better choices. 6. The Rigol's is okay, but until its 27" it's not big enough. I would now buy the 12b scope too (I have sds2000x+). I bought a rigol 4 channel 100MHz and boy ain't that a treat. Rigol DS1054Z Oscilloscope. 5 Digit Desktop Multimeters - B&K 5493C / Instek GDM-9060 / Rigol DM3068 / Siglent SDM3065X / Teledyne T3DMM6-5 If you have used any of the following 6. These have great features, are compact and portable and cheap. Tools. 🏷️ Rigol DS1054Z ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐. I love my old 34401A DMMs which can now be had on eBay for $400, but my $1700 34465A has logging and graphing functions, and screenshots can easily be grabbed over a network connection and dropped into a report. Siglent VS. But don’t be disheartened by this result. I am curious if there are similar capabilities possible with the Siglent 1104. The Rigol 1054z is a commonly recommended starter scope, and can be easily upgraded to 100MHz. extremely happy with it so far. 5 GHz offered by the Rigol DSA815-TG. Ive got 2 non-functional analog scopes sitting in my basement, I thought Id repair by getting a siglent 1104, turns out I dont have time and the siglent is better than the two scopes combined so why bother. I saw a review of a Siglent spectrum analyser on youtube - they are expensive even from Siglent (3k) but the features are like a 10k Agilent model. So maybe sell the keysight and get a the rigol oscilloscope and a rigol spectrum analyzer or a power supply. Hacked Rigol 1054Z (100MHz), Hantek 2C10 or 5102 the usual suspects, they will all work great. Right now I want to decide between the Rigol DS1054Z, the Rigol DS 1074Z Plus, and the Rigol 1074Z-S Plus and I have a few questions for you great people. I seem to remember that out of the low cost brands out there the Siglent units were better than the Rigol units. 5 Users. I ordered a DSLogic Plus LA, so I'm hopefully covered for diagnosing the SPI comms between ADC and MCU. Siglent is another one to check out, maybe they'll have something else you value. History view. Single 1GS/s and a bit slower than the Siglent when I tried it (but also a bit older). So I’m very tempted to get the Owon HDS272S or HDS2102S. These two look pretty similar. If you are looking for an oscilloscope that offers top-quality signal fidelity and performance, then the Siglent SDS1104X-E is the perfect choice for you. Reply reply Sep 7, 2018 · Siglent Pros: hackable to 200Mhz Higher multi-channel sampling 1M FFT No side buttons = more screen space for waveforms Front panel not as ugly (to me) LXI/LAN speed 400VDC input (vs 300VDC) (yes, I know it doesn't matter, but a plus is a plus and mistakes happen) Optional extras that aren't worth the money especially thanks to toys like the Oct 9, 2019 · Re: Which DC load - Rigol DL3021 or Siglent SDL1020X-E? « Reply #2 on: June 30, 2020, 03:02:29 pm » Well, now I am trying to decide between Rigol DL3021A and Siglent SD1020X. ; the Siglent looks and feels kind of cheapish (plastic quality etc. Mar 8, 2023 · Rigol is a Chinese company that manufactures electronic test and measurement instruments. Overall it's very good. With the quality of the Chinese-designed equipment like Rigol and Siglent getting so good, it's much less clear-cut. If you are wondering what Amateur Radio is about, it's basically a two way radio service where licensed operators throughout the world experiment and communicate with each other on frequencies reserved for license holders. First, it offers a real-time sampling rate of 1 GSa/s (Total of 2A-to-D converters). I think this kinda explains how Rigol got its foot in the door, by producing a quality scope for HP/Agilent. When using all four channels I'm limited to 50Mhz, but that's better than the 25Mhz the Rigol can provide. Reply reply Aug 18, 2018 · Hi, I'm curious about the Siglent SDS1104X-E vs. Rigol DS1054Z. But the Siglent has that beautiful color LCD display, with graphs and everything. The current (January 2020) most popular go-to for a low cost bench scope is the Rigol 1054z. Yep, I've got a RIGOL DS-1054z 50mhz 4 channel scope that I cracked to unlock 100mhz, way more than capable for the job of synth stuff. 3 Reactions. but if you are on However, the Siglent SDS1104X-E looks very promising as it is much newer and has mixed-signal capabilities (upgradable through extra cost though - not very cheap IIRC), and does not downscale its sampling rate as much as the Rigol one when using all four channels (Siglent: 1 GHz w/ 1 or 2 ch, and 500 MHz quad, while the Rigol one downscales to Siglent SDS1104X-U vs. Feature-4: Channels. The only major difference is a wave length which is only 16Kpts for Siglent model vs 2 MPts for Rigol. I'm Dec 27, 2023 · All that said, kudos to Rigol for being first to market in this affordable 12-bit space (much as they were with the DS1054) and no doubt pushing Siglent to compete. 8 Posts. I definitely need 3 channels, 2 of them being adjustable is fine. For Siglent, the SDS1104-XE seems to offer a lot of bang for the buck, but I guess a little over your budget. Interface is very good. Siglent SVA's (Spectrum & Vector) are reasonable counterparts, maybe worth looking at. I'm kind of the opposite, had a Picoscope and have an oscilloscope (the ubiquitous Rigol DS1054Z). It's got 4 channels, and 50MHz and can be software unlocked to offer 100MHz bandwidth (often for free without manufacturer approval, although this may not be legal in your country of residence). I traded for siglent because it had more channels. . I'm not sure what your use cases are, and explaining everything you might want to do with it will help us make a recommendation. You should read our reviews and get an oscilloscope to decide for yourself. I legitimately don't understand wanting to do protocol decoding on a scope. The GDS 2104E has a lower sample frequency (1GHz / 2GHz), more memory (10Mpt/2Mpt) and a higher frame update rate (120k/s / 80k/s) than the older GDS 2104A, which has a logic analyser and generator option. Would like to see intermediate frequency in superheterodyne radio. The only suggestion I'd make that others haven't is to check out the entry level Keysight and Tektronix offerings. Use case: "undefined"-home-amateur use to debug some arduino-stuff or radio-equipment. Thanks, Dave So basically I am deciding between the Siglent SDS814X HD and Rigol 914. Do yourself a favor: when you buy the oscope, buy an additional set of probes and probe wires, and if you are getting it on amazon, throw a benchtop dc power supply and a set of Larger screen. 13 to protest Reddit's API changes which affect 3rd party Reddit apps. vob zhzwb smgusx bijgplvn apwx kfy yqcbwm wkggc upsguq yupn