Av1 settings youtube meaning reddit I use a bitrate of 50,000 to stream to the box if using rtmp, but I've also tried NDI. Like this where 4k VP9 has 10x the bitrate of Without hardware decoding, AV1 streams will lag the page, suck up battery life, or both, and I don't think AV1 playback in-browser is in a great place right now—I get subtle audio/video desync when watching 60fps AV1 videos on Youtube. r/YouTube is for discussion about YouTube. But that won't help you in any way since it wouldn't be optimal. But it's also interesting to see "VVC slower" doesn't perform much better than libaom-cpu0. I’ve searched up many YouTube videos on this and they all seem to be outdated for using AV1 to upload to YouTube. 265 for a similar quality, and other types can result in bigger files. I’m not sure what to do. Even with the push to it, youtube is probably the first to feel the pain of converting nearly a week's worth of footage a day that's relatively quick enough for even the uploader to review the finished video. The encoder has 2 settings, VBR and CQ. The label shows when the conversion actually reduced file size. In this video I share my experience with streaming content on YouTube using the latest codec called AV1. I mean, it won't be the same as the original, but the quality/size tradeoff is very good. Oh. Now YouTube will force AV1 on every video that you play. Not someone picking presets. I want to go to ~1000kb/s AV1. someone in AV1 (if AV1 experience exists properly yet). 28 votes, 21 comments. I’m a complete beginner and I don’t understand most of the settings and what they mean. 04 mAh of battery. They were using streamlabs, and I installed obs because I thought the new version had AV1 support. Why its so hard to encode video at decent speeds? I meant with the powerfull modern hardware you should be able to get at least a few fps encoding speed, yet performance is a tragedy, as much as we all love a royalty free codec it seems useless without the necesseray work done for encode/decode. Av1 is crap when we convert in hardware or low preset, only good when we use high preset and you are expert of tunning. 10 bit is a lot more efficient than 8 bit but mostly found on higher quality media like Movies or TV shows. My current iGPU Vega 7 does not have av1, the decoding of av1 is done in cpu amd ryzen 5500u. And sometimes the bitrate difference is massive. But the settings are a little overwhelming, I don't know if there is a certain threshold that would dramatically increase the render time or file size without making much of difference. co. Then you will probably want to put the video on a SSD (fast read speeds), or at least have the settings adjusted to import a copy of the video into a location that is also a SSD. These settings helped preserve the snow flurries in the first scene of the first episode of Game of Thrones. Anyway Vega 7 has hw acceleration for YouTube Decode vp9 profile0 64x64 to 8192x4320 pixels Decode vp9 profile2 64x64 to 8192x4320 pixels 23 votes, 15 comments. true. The most efficient, modern combination for media is: AV1 for video + Opus for audio + SubRip for subtitles + MKV for container "Faster" is questionable though. It has been working OK for me, but in looking at recommended parameter settings around, I see a lot of suggestions I don't understand, or which conflict with other suggestions. SVT AV1 encoding - Different settings, screenshots comparison For what it's worth, here are some screenshots for subjective comparison. TL;DR I'm not sure what to do about settings for streaming to a second box that does the encoding. The SVT-AV1 encoder presets are pretty reasonably spaced out in encoding time and quality for size, like x264 encoder presets are. It looks good to me. Yes, AV1 is somewhat based on the VP10 project and a spiritual successor to VP9, but hardware decoders are fixed-function hardware, meaning that it will only do stuff correctly when using VP9 data. 265 codec which has a better compression rate and quality. Original HEVC video with FLAC audio re-muxed. The settings I'm using are: Codec: AOM AV1 Framerate: Keep Original Colour: Automatic The Real Housewives of Atlanta; The Bachelor; Sister Wives; 90 Day Fiance; Wife Swap; The Amazing Race Australia; Married at First Sight; The Real Housewives of Dallas Use SVT-AV1 on preset 7 if you want an fast encoder. Meaning this will use VP9 codecs for higher resolutions, which should give you the proper colorful HDR you desire instead of the washed out grainy look when AV1 is used. Only problem is that I get less than 2 fps with my Ryzen Computation is still the obstacle AV1 needs to jump over for any sane company to justify mass adoption. I think that an Intel Arc based AV1 media encoding project is probably the most viable option for simple, high quality library building. In testing, I'm seeing what I consider to be overly good compression ratios with AV1, and wanted to sanity-check my encode settings against you fine folks. However, many explanations are unclear and sometimes contradictory. Google also has already implemented AV1 use on YouTube. Jul 29, 2024 · We explain the AV1 settings on the YouTube settings page and how to use them to improve your video-watching experience. yes it's a lot for streaming but not impossible + 8k streaming is completely dumb, nobody have an 8k screen nor an 8k "really" capable gpu. Maybe a lower CRF will help. A 3. My new iPHone has it now. minitool. Just a bit more efficiency and it'd be just fine. Im streaming at 1080p 60 fps with nvenc cbr and want to record 1080p for youtube via cqp at the same time. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concer 2D animation generally offers a lot of room for compression since there's not a lot of motion and variations every moment resulting in inconsistent bitrate across scenes and different anime which shouldn't really be a issue if you're getting desired quality, you can try capped CRF or average bitrate options for more consistent bitrate I guess. As the destination for your footage is YouTube, you should be rendering out VBR with a bitrate near to what YouTube recommends - it will re-encode it to that bitrate anyway. Isn't dedicated AV1 encoding, hardware based here anyway? How much more performance are we expecting higher end SKUs to scale? AV1 is superior of them all but reserved for newest gen GPU that can encode and decode them + depends in the platform even supports AV1 decoding but i think youtube maybe already prepared for it and not sure for others not to mention can also vary on viewers download speed and theres few second stream delay Thanks for everybody’s responses. So instead of asking more questions, I come with answers. Note that these guidelines are all for 8-bit SDR live-action/animation sources. AV1 is going to be great for companies hosting videos,Twitch, Netflix. youtube. You would have to go to really extreme (and not-useful) settings, to get AV1 to make a file that inefficient. There is really no place for AVI for regular joe in 2023. SVT being one of three popular choices, SVT, aomenc and rav1e. The worst part here is that I even kept my old settings, meaning medium usage presets, CQP at 25 for the recording, stuff that is really simple for a good encoder. Despite the seemingly meticulous work done, there's no mention of GOP size, so we must assume that default settings were used, and key frame interval was not the same for the encoders. AV1 is available for some videos on streaming sites such as YouTube. x265 was kind of an oddball there, where the rational choices seem to be veryfast or slow and everything else is confused. Maybe someone can say the equivallent preset of svt-av1? But yes it's a solution. So i chose YouTube RTMPS and then i selected av1 and started streaming . This is a fan sub, not run or owned by YouTube! Please read the… May 5, 2024 · These are my basic settings for streaming on youtube with AV1. With AV1 I'm not sure what CRF would be considered visually lossless, and by visually lossless I mean I want it to look exactly like the input keeping any sort of grain. Time Difference: The encoding speed difference between NVIDIA NVENC and SVT-AV1 is substantial. Also be sure to use Av1an if you encode with aomenc as aomenc can't utilize multiple threads alone. AV1 is looking to get the best compression possible, so it will made sacrifices. and honestly it shouldn't, unless it wants to overheat phones and kill batteries fast due to high CPU usage Youtube 8k 60fps video is between 25 to 32 mbps IN AV1. The ESP32 series employs either a Tensilica Xtensa LX6, Xtensa LX7 or a RiscV processor, and both dual-core and single-core variations are available. Yes I streamed in 1080p at 6k-9k bitrate using av1 codec to YouTube the stream was being played with vpo9 but once stream ends YouTube will convert video to avc1. This was almost exactly double the power consumption of 720p60 H. Currently, using AV1 (SVT) with Constant Quality set to RF 48, with Encoder Options set to Preset 8, Tune: none, Profile: main, Level: auto. As such, I've decided to lead (somewhat independently lmao) a different much more open approach to what I believe will be the strongest for AV1 encoder development: on public forums platforms like Reddit, doom9 forums, and a few others, I'll start taking feedback and ideas for various improvements and suggestions on what features to add and These reasons are why the manufacturers (NVidia, AMD, etc) and video providers (Netflix, YouTube, etc) are pushing AV1 very hard. RTX 3000, RDNA2 and up has an AV1 decoder. 1GB. Those produce VMAF scores above 95% mean an mostly keep the 1% low over 93% (dips to 90% here and there). These reasons are why the manufacturers (NVidia, AMD, etc) and video providers (Netflix, YouTube, etc) are pushing AV1 very hard. Thanks You should use AV1 and only downscale to 1440p if possible. It simply takes time to get hardware support even when it's a much better encoding. My internet is also sufficiently fast enough at a 1000Mbit/s. If they're restreaming h265 could give some issues though as it's not supported by Twitch (and some other platforms). If a video has millions of views, but YouTube thinks that it won't be watched a lot now, they won't bother to encode it in AV1, but if a video from a very well known YouTuber that just came out only has thousands of views because, for example, they released 1. Still not as good as the original file but what can you do. Meaning that on average, a minute of 1080p60 AV1 video playback took 11. Can't confirm, getting AV1 with Edge just fine, both 4k and 8k youtube videos (and no hardware decoding). Then, for every file u encode, u need to check if u want better quality or not, and tune the settings accordingly. I think that basically, it depends on their estimation of "How many views this video will get from now" . I just found out that av1 codec is being use by default(on AV1 encoded youtube video***) from 480p and below, and whoops its… Looks like you're asking for help! Please check to make sure you've included the following information. 4M subscribers in the youtube community. i know this is old, but with all new cards supporting both encoding and decoding, i hope that we will get more videos using it. With some testing, u need to find the generic settings that give u a satisfying result most of the time and use them. Preset 6 and lower is where it is at. it's gonna be a direct no go, for the same reason that h265 was a failure in I'm not new to video encoding, but I'm just now digging into AV1. I massaged my OBS' settings until I was able to get my encoder lag down to around 1% and was about to post here when I thought, lets reboot. 1. In both cases I use a target bitrate rather than quantizer preset, for example a target bitrate of 50% of the source file's. See full list on youtubedownload. In CapCut, always try to export the video in 4K + HEVC (If supported), this will make YouTube use the VP9 coded to display your video, which has a much I have been enjoying using the AV1 codec on regular YouTube since I set a preference for it in the YouTube settings. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concer So, with the recent SVT-AV1 quality improvement changes landing in master, I was curious about how SVT-AV1 handled animation at very low bitrates (128 kbps). So if it was already giving you AV1 at 1080P when you had it set to Auto, then I don't think either of the other two settings are going to help matters. This is good for people who stream in 1080p resolution and want better quality streams on YouTube just use av1. For SVT-AV1 I recommend preset 5(/6) at CRF 24-28. Don't put the encoder preset to high performance or high quality, just leave it on the default so that VBR is also the encoder mode. AV1 encoding is a breeze and it is no trouble setting a stream up and streaming at 12000 Bitrate. I'm looking at changing from HEVC to AV1 for long-term archiving of some youtube streams and was hoping for some input on the best settings to use to match my current quality of videos with better bitrates. It talks about HEVC, but the same applies for AV1 and you'll even get slightly better quality at the same bitrates listed. Currently i am using an extension "Not yet, AV1" for disable av1 and enable vp9. There have been many posts about the settings people use to improve quality in SVTAV1. It's likely going to depend on if their self hosted solution is capable of transcoding those down to h. While also preventing artifacts around moving objects. 1 768kbps from (DTS HD/DD TrueHD) filters: deblock: ultralight (8x8) Video settings: Encoder options: Preset 5 tune: PSNR Profile: main Level: 4. Decide this morning to grab a 1080p source with basically no grain and run the next few days some tests with different cq levels. My source file is the UHD HDR bluray copy of BladeRunner 2049. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. When i checked in Firefox the stream was displaying but it was telling me av1 was not supported by YouTube stream detail page SVT-AV1 has no problem saturating my 8-core 16-thread Ryzen computer on a 1080p file, meaning that all 16 cores are at or above 90 percent pretty much continuously. To compete with that, a bunch of free/open efforts were combined (vp9, daala, thor) to create av1. Are there adjustments in AV1 encoding settings that might address these issues, or is this a limitation of AV1 itself? Yes. Side-stepping the subjective question of is AV1 better, ALL major hardware vendors are adding hardware support. I tried to search for info but I only get info for regular YouTube since "YouTube TV" contains r/AV1 is available on https://lemmy. If you right-click on a video and pick “Stats for nerds” you'll see av01 as Codec. Compare to SW encoders, SVT-AV1, the settings for real time encoding gave me worse quality than the HW encoder, the difference is very subtle, SVT-AV1 creates more artifacts, and has less detail. It's up to Youtube to decide on a per-video basis, and they generally want to save as much bandwidth as possible, meaning high-view videos are more likely to get transcoded to AV1. I've been testing AV1 with aomenc via the fantastic webm. Hi. I think maybe at 8K all the videos get AV1, but at that point you're better just using AV1 in handbrake or something. When the video hit 5 mill, youtube decided to add an AV1 version of my video, and it honestly looks so very close to the original source file. From my search it seems that the AV1 spec allows for images up to 65,535 x 65,535, and even more using tiling. What is the meaning of AV1 YouTube video streaming? Aug 7, 2022 · Well in this YouTube tutorial and benchmarking video, let's go over how to get AV1 codec on YouTube, what the AV1 YouTube settings do, and let's settle the Youtube VP9 vs AV1 debate. File size increased to 10. 2 terdapat 2 pilihan encoder yaitu AOM-AV1 dan SVT-AV1 Encoder. https://www. It's irritating having to change it every damn time. AV1 also shows us the way forward for even higher definition. Prefer AV1 for SD : opt into receiving AV1 at SD sizes, making it more likely for you to get AV1 at those sizes than if you had it at Auto Prefer AV1 : opt into recieving AV1 at all sizes. With my small youtube channel, no videos are encoded in AV1, what triggers AV1 encoding, it it amount of views, popularity of Youtube channel, or… AV1 is the newest codec of the three. yes, with kiwi browser until google will make edits like some in 2022 and in 2023 it will change to manifest 3. I'm going to be capturing from my PS4 (and my PS5 down the road) and until recently I've used OBS with CPU-driven encoding because the GPU in the computer was an older Radeon card and my past experience with AMD's encoder is that it tends to make video rather blocky compared to CPU-driven software encoders. 265. I heard people say you should upscale it to 4k resolution regardless to get best quality, but I’m just not sure. this method doesn't need root. INTEL Tiger Lake CPU's have AV1 Hardware Decoding. It's outside the range of what people normally do. That would allow for 5k, 6k, and 8k video on current bluray media with no other changes I've tried several combinations of settings but keep getting output compressed too much. Encode at CRF 28 but I imagine most people don't really care. Nothing to do with the channel directly, they don't get to decide which formats their upload gets re-encoded in. They have to do so for compatibility reasons. Tune rest of the settings of the encoder to your liking. A tool is only as useful as the person using it. While x265 always keeps the grain with just a higher bitrate, AV1 will remove it completely and would instead build a grain model which however needs to be activated. There is a playlist of 8K/4K AV1 videos you can test with. When I tried this, it kept playing 1080p AV1 streams when 4K VP9 was available, as well as 480p AV1 when 1080p VP9 was available. They clearly chose to lower their server costs while keeping the same quality rather than improving the quality at all. The youtube av1 encoder is not very good. The default CRF value I think I read was 50 for AV1 and the ffmpeg wiki examples show 30 so I assume that's a reasonable value but not visually lossless. From an ideological perspective, av1 means anyone can add support for it without paying licensing fees which should mean ubiquitous support. ) with my kids for archival purposes. I tried latest obs and rtx 4070ti streaming to YouTube I selected YouTube HLS and of course i cannot select AV1 encoding streaming . And if they don't want the resulting AV1 videos to look significantly worse than the source file that's already been compressed to crap, they need The video is at 720p and the source had 25 fps, but I've been trying with higher fps and resolution and the quality are quite good. As do others. Using a 2160p@60 AV1 encode from YouTube, since YouTube sometimes encodes stuff to AV1 now, I found that with dav1d 1. Did you expect YouTube to retain an AV1 video in just AV1? Every single video uploaded to YouTube gets re-encoded to AV1, VP9, and AVC in various resolutions, frame rates, and HDR/SDR options (depending on the uploaded file). But I still don't have any AV1 options. This is a fan sub, not run or owned by YouTube! Please read the… The rest are more personal, but you should read up on the AV1 settings here. Some fine detail does look better under AV1, though. AV1 is the latest video encoder. H265 or something would be a much more reasonable spec bump. 5. Basically, my intention had been to stream 1080p60 with QuickSync 264, but record in 4K60 with QuickSync HEVC (or 264, or AV1). 35-40 is where Youtube quality can be achieved without using more exotic settings. To turn on AV1 settings on YouTube, here are the steps: Step1 Go to playback and performance. 7. Youtube gives AV1 to channels with a lot of traffic, so, very hard to achieve at start. The priority for encoding is also AVC > VP9 > AV1. i have enhanced h264ify and block checked to all but not AV1 . Though neither is AV1. r/AV1 is available on https://lemmy. AV1 is a video codec that is a competitor to H. Enable grain synth, and adjust strength to your liking. So it will accept your AV1, and reencode to AVC (H264), VP9, and hopefully if they feel generous Dec 30, 2024 · It offers you advanced compression, enabling you to do smoother HD streaming and data savings for the video. I'd highly recommend showing the percentage decrease or increase and final file size even if it doesn't reduce it. Encoding in hevc with your graphic card is better and you can choose the bitrate. 4. This tab is also called Account Playback settings. AV1 is the most efficient codec as of now and svt-av1 is the fastest AV1 encoder. 0, in Kodi, an i7 4790 only drops the occasional frame. These are my encoder settings for recording with either AV1 or HEVC. ESP32 is a series of low cost, low power system on a chip microcontrollers with integrated Wi-Fi and dual-mode Bluetooth. The main parameters I use in ffmpeg are: - CRF: 27. I kinda understand that AV1 encoding is kinda hard, and YouTube does not reencode all videos to AV1, just the famous ones so YouTube can save bandwidth. Yep, that fits. Whether I use Auto (recommended), Prefer AV1 for SD, or Always prefer AV1, it keeps changing my damn video quality. Expand user menu Open settings menu. Kedua pilihan encoder ini menggunakan CPU, dan As in the subject. The AVI and AV1 are very different things. I know for example that this card is shit with VR, what performance should i achieve in rasterization, how much money i have :PThe OBS Twitter headline just slightly mislead me: "This release brings additional encoders, including AV1 on the AMD RX7000 series and AV1/HEVC for supported Intel GPUs on Windows" The YouTube engineer at the recent AV1 summit talk said something similar, that it was technically saving them money in some situations already for low res streams but that the idea was to get the payback mostly in future when hardware decoders are available and they can deploy the larger bitrates for highly popular content, so at the moment it's still in the investing stage. If enough production studios accept it we may get AV1 on BluRay. My source file is a cartoon, 11min, 700MB, x264 at 8000kb/s. Can I get the same thing on YouTube TV? I couldn't find where to set such a preference in YouTube TV settings. Blu Rays don't take much longer to get good results. As far as I understand tiling, it seems that spatial compression techniques may not cross tiles, meaning compression artifacts could become more obvious at the border between tiles at lower bitrates. Wait, does this mean that we're looking at yet another example of next-gen codecs not actually increasing HEVC is made to compress video for blu-rays, broadcast, places where keeping the original image is more important then the best compression. Use the psy SVT fork instead of vanilla SVT-AV1. It enjoys even greater efficiency than H265 meaning it will result in even smaller files with the same quality, but takes longer to encode than H265. 2, especially at the slowest presets. Source is 8bits 1080p, encoded with an i7-8750H using ffmpeg. The best settings I've used yet. I just assumed that even if I didn't have hardware AV1 that I would have software AV1, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Also very curious about the financials and workflow for YouTube, Netflix, when it comes to making av1 files in house for bandwidth saving. For significantly noisy content, I would use different settings. We use OBS-NDI to stream as many as 3 PC's to my PC (which I use to play as well) and record in OBS on my PC using a base of 3840x2160, downsampled to 1440p using lossless utvideo at 60fps and 50k bitrate. Let's say you target VMAF 92, 93 quality, and AV1 will always be slower and smaller. I encoded the newest Venture Bros movie at CRF 63 (with a custom quantization matrix), while keeping the original 1080p resolution. (They have a 3050 right now). 6 GB 2 hour 1080p AV1 file is at the edge of what I could imagine running into. I haven't done any personal tests with AV1, so I can't speak to exactly how much smaller the files with be, or how much slower it is comparatively. 264 at 8k or lower bitrate to maintain Twitch compatibility. 5 - Preset: slower - Output depth: 10-bit My videos on youtube use the VP09 codec but I wanna switch it to AV1 codec. On this phone, you could "only" watch 6 hours and 47 minutes of YouTube's 1080p60 AV1 before the battery dropped from 100% to 10%. NVIDIA NVENC achieves an encoding speed of 301 FPS, while SVT-AV1 reaches 27 FPS on the Intel Core i9-14900F processor. 5% encoder lag. Isn't the whole point of AV1 to preserve visual quality while reducing file size? The NVENC AV1 does not do that. I suspect that VVC encoders still have a lot of room for improvement especially at the faster speed settings. TLDR: learn to make a post that makes people want to help you, question why you're getting downvoted to oblivion. I'd like to see further testing here as well. but AV1 seems to have a "type". Ability to use HEVC and AV1 is pretty exciting though, 1080p60 stream with 10 Mbps and AV1 would look really good. Similarly to H265/HEVC, it can provide better video quality and at lower bitrates than H264. SVT-AV1 is doing pretty well across all the speed settings compared to the competition. (vlc/mpv) da1vd has currently these optimisations: Trust me, i did some research, and that was well thought idea to buy this card. uk) I can't play any av1 stream Enabled the flag #enable-media-foundation-clear and now I can play the above test Av1 videos, so the codec apparently should be working But still Youtube refuses to give me back the Av1 options Since the NLE friendly DNxHR is too huge to store, this is the perfect opportunity to try out the AV1 encoding. It is of little concern to people editing videos. I've been using the SVT AV1 release candidate for a number of encodes recently. I can see the difference between OG vs. Netflix, Google, and MediaTek have all made recent announcements about AV1. Go to YouTube's Settings --> Playback and performance --> Prefer AV1 for SD. The highest the definition, the more AV1 shines. world/c/av1 due to changes in Reddit policies. AV1 has gotten faster but the placebo preset is slow as hell. Reboot seems to have fixed most of whatever was going on, b/c after a reboot streaming and recording in both AV1 dropped to less than 0. Edit your post (or leave a top-level comment) if you haven't included this information. I mean it's cool that they are trying, not sure how I'm feeling about the fact that basically they want people transcoding their own streams instead of just offering that service to everyone, like YouTube does. make sense since your hardware doesn't have AV1 hardware decoding so it fallbacks to your CPU. I read that I got to change it in the settings under playback and performance, but it would do this for 3 videos then go back to auto 144p. Step 5: Alternate Way to Enable AV1 Settings. Are there settings, or compressing techniques that can automatically change my codec from VP09 to AV1? Thanks Settings > Playback and Performance. It depends on your export codec, YouTube will always use VP9 (the best codec) if you export the video in 4K, it will use the HEVC/H. I know that AV1 is slow, but I have to really slow down DVDs to get good results, partially because even small losses look so much bigger when you expand the video to fit an HD or UHD display. Not to worried about the coding time as I encode in a VM with 8 cpus running on proxmox. AV1. NVIDIA RTX 30 Series have AV1 Hardware Decoding. On that note, I have been testing software AV1 decoding. Your proposed 30% savings would have a 23GB file. Meaning some types of videos can end up 2-3 times smaller than h. AV1 can keep a surprising amount of detail at CRF 40 and even 42. Like H265/HEVC though, it's not supported on any site except YouTube because of how The (un)official home of #teampixel and the #madebygoogle lineup on Reddit. In particular if you find that SVT 'oversmooths', try out raising the sharpness, increasing the variance boost strength, and/or lowering the variance octile. AV1 settings using Handbrake are as follows: AV1 10 bit (SVT) VFR (source) AAC 5. So completely ignore it. Couldn't you achieve this by just setting AV1 for SD videos through YouTube settings? It will only use AV1 for SD resolutions and VP9 or AVC for everything else. the AV1 (SVT) is referring to the encoder used to encode AV1 (the format). 0 compatible extensions that will render all extensions obsolete, especially without play store. An alternate way to change the codec settings is to access the YouTube TestTube page. I know i have searched many times about recommended settings. To turn on the AV1 settings, go to your YouTube account, after that click "Playback and Hello! I have been encoding for a while now and just cannot figure out how to get av1 to look crisp and clear. Feb 27, 2022 · Sekarang pada OBS Studio versi terbaru yaitu 27. 264 video, and a 41% increase over 720p60 AV1 video. AFAIK 8K videos always get AV1. with that setting 480p and lower will be AV1, 720p and higher will be VP9. com Sep 16, 2024 · As with almost all video codecs, there is no one fits all setting. Oh man do people have opinions about AV1 settings Lol throw time etc out the window. SVT-AV1 has had a ton of quality and speed optimization work done since 1. I'm using latest version 3. 6M subscribers in the youtube community. This means that NVIDIA NVENC is approximately 11 times faster than SVT-AV1 in terms of encoding speed. More and more TV's are getting AV1 Support Hardware ENCODING probably won't be a thing in the next few years Playback: dav1d is the most common used av1 decoder. if h266 ( such a bad name btw ) have license, which probably gonna have . Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. I tried to record using both settings and couldnt see any difference between the recordings but file size with 14 was more than double of 20. I doubt a 1080p AV1 looks bettern then a 4k VP9 on Youtube. All AV1 encoders work totally different compared to x265. If the file is ending up too big, it's not crazy to increase the crf yet more. As Ischemia37 said, numbers mean nothing, it's your satisfaction on the result that matters. And 20 is its default. My Rig: Ryzen 9 7900x, RTX 4090. So from a practical perspective, av1 means higher quality video / less bandwidth used / less space used. Enjoy!Live Streaming AV1 testing full: https://youtub Youtube doesn't keep the source files for any uploaded videos and thus when they decide to roll out a new codec, they have to use one of the already re-encoded videos as a source for the AV1 encode. of couse the cpu is NVENC AV1 encoding using the exact same settings otherwise, took 9min 56s. Get support, learn new information, and hang out in the subreddit dedicated to Pixel, Nest, Chromecast, the Assistant, and a few more things from Google. You can watch this video about tricks for YouTube that would allow you to downscale farther for internet issues while still maintaining the most quality possible. I'd strongly encourage trying out nightly SVT-AV1 builds (the project at GitLab offers downloading standalone and ffmpeg binaries as artifacts), or hold on for a few more days until 1. edit I looked for some samples. My CPU is Ryzen9 5950x. com/account_playback. We wouldn’t need settings to begin with, if there was. I like to record gameplay (Fortnite, Minecraft, etc. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome, including build help, tech support, and any doubt one might have about PC ownership. edge://gpu reports av1 is installed and active. Let me know in the comments if there are any questions you have! Aug 7, 2022 · You can actually use AV1 on YouTube? But how do you turn on AV1 on YouTube? And how does the AV1 codec improve your YouTube experience? Well in this YouTube Well my point kinda was more broadly what encoding settings give best results with YouTube. Go to the YouTube TestTube page. Same, my video was VP9 and it looked horrible compared to the original file I had on my HDD. DVD takes about 4 hours or so at these settings. Action Movies & Series; Animated Movies & Series; Comedy Movies & Series; Crime, Mystery, & Thriller Movies & Series; Documentary Movies & Series; Drama Movies & Series The bitrates that youtube uses for AV1 are so low that the quality is usually even and sometimes arguably worse than the AVC and VP9 streams. If you have a graphics card or intel cpu that is less than 5 years old VP9 will probably be accelerated and AV1 will not be, so AV1 will consume more CPU and battery life than VP9 for Youtube video's but you definitely get better video quality with AV1. . You can read more about it here. No AVX. You have no hardware to encode AV1 anyway. 21 votes, 14 comments. Meaning the data is useless. Note that YouTube will reencode your video regardless of the codec you're using to stream. Youtube just wants to save bandwidth if you device can handle it, you can only judge the quality by looking manually and comparing (even h264 is better sometimes) but usually av1 is better on chill scenes but gets wonky with action-filled ones, vp9 is the most reliable personally, but you may like the av1 savings. You can check if VP9 is hardware accelerated by opening chrome://gpu and making sure VP9 is present in the "Video Acceleration Information". So as for what is happening, I've been having this very particular issue with streaming AV1 to YouTube. X can be zero for greater fidelity, or up to maybe 12 or 16 depending on the content. Should I upscale, how YouTube encoder handles encodes done with different encoders, how YouTube handles bitrate differences (example unnecessarily high bitrates). Edit: After lots of updates, preset 4 at CRF 20 is what I have settled on. So what is AV1? Why is AV1 im YouTube > Settings > Playback and performance > AV1 settings: Have "Prefer AV1 for SD" checked. 0 Fast decode - yes Quality: constant quality RF 23 AV1 is fast taking over the internet, but why is that and should you take notice of it too? In this video we breakdown the basics of what AV1 is and why comp What gives? How is youtube so much better? What settings do they use for encoding? Which encoder do they use? (libaom-av1, libsvtav1, i also know of libdav1d but I've never used it), other?). Youtube is 8 bit, 12 bit is only for professionals to make color grading more versatile. 3 GB AV1 file is extremely high quality. 5 is officially released. Visual quality same. Could be something on your end, or youtube not recognizing your system as powerful enough (which usually should be either a decent CPU (like 8+ cores) or hw decode), not microsoft. You can do the same for 4k but x265 vs AV1 (ignore x264) As tech and game enthusiasts I've done a few tests on YouTube support for AV1 and HEVC with HDR and 10-bit and both of the codecs work for me, the container can be MKV or MP4. I created a 2 minute test clip directly from 1080p bluray source Any new standard is going to be "way behind" by your definition. Honestly my frame of reference has been Apple/Meta for AV1, the Quest 3 only just got hw AV1 and I believe only M3 has it for Apple laptops, less than a year old. Really helps scrub through the video a lot more smoothly. I have been encoding with an untouched bluray file trying to get some decent quality out of it. py helper script and via ffmpeg with librav1e. YouTube Red/TV and Tubi both use AV1 today. If the GUI still uses QP it's outdated. For NVIDIA GPUs it hasn't even been 3 years, AV1 decode got added in the RTX 30 series and encode was 40 series. I read that it doesnt really change the quality if you go below 14. you can use 8 bit until 4k 30 fps youtube. And don't use QP, use crf. On this page MP4 ( AV1 ) | Test Videos (test-videos. Even though AV1 is similar, the differences between it and VP9 are big enough that companies need to design another hardware just for decoding that. Find the AV1 settings, and there will be 3 options there. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concer r/AV1 is available on https://lemmy. From… Sure I can send you generic SVT-AV1 settings, I have plenty of those DEPENDING ON THE CONTENT I'm trying to encode. Personally, I like to use these for non-noisy content: input-depth=10:tune=0:rc=0:keyint=240:lookahead=120:film-grain=x. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Software encoder does, at the cost of 12x longer encoding time (on this particular system I use). You could've also started by test encoding chunks rather than entire Movie-length projects. The efficiency really is incredible. Maybe your settings are causing YT to not recognize the video properly for it to transcode them. Netflix is slowly rolling out AV1 for selected TVs and on its Android app. I cannot get AV1 format from Youtube when I signed in. Anything higher is where the low quality threshold starts. Most peoples use of AVIF is to reduce the size and they need to know that it didn't reduce and It would've been a good idea to research AV1 further before making comparison tests. Wouldn't it be h265 that has a "type"? Meaning some types of videos can end up 2-3 times smaller than AV1 for a similar quality, and other types can result in bigger files. Does this mean people can watch this in the AV1 native stream or does YouTube transcode AV1 to another codec. It's not a good resource. I think you need to be patient, though, or buy a better computer. A 6. As you can probably deduct by now, i'm a complete noob when it comes to video encoders/decoders. I wouldn't want it to consume more than that because then the mouse wouldn't move--it's already too slow to browse the web comfortably when encoding. It is possible that a lower-res AV1 looks better then a higher-res VP9 with higher bitrate, but it is unlikely that you can find such a combination on Youtube. Just how many hours (watt hours?) Are worth "wasting" on an encode for extremely popular files. But on the box i've tried a bunch of different settings combinations where the only constant is the resolution - 1080p. The bandwidth savings, PLUS cost savings is pushing AV1 right now. I see your point, but disagree a bit with your simple statement :). 264 for the other platforms, otherwise they're pretty much stuck on h. but you need at least a 780g. llhxk wxnai pglb veelj chf zueqy vmcfbxn urwp zsjnm jwafwh